Job search strategies and early careers of clinical informatics fellowship alumni (2016-2022).

OBJECTIVE: To report on clinical informatics (CI) fellows' job search and early careers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the summer of 2022, we performed a voluntary and anonymous survey of 242 known clinical informatics fellowship alumni from 2016 to 2022. The survey included questions about their initial job search process; first job, salary, and informatics time after training; and early career progression over the first 1-6 years after fellowship. RESULTS: Nearly half (101, 41.7%) responded to the survey. Median informatics time was 50%; most were compensated similar/better than a purely clinical position. Most reported CI fellowship significantly impacted their career, were satisfied with their first and current job after training, and provided advice for current fellows and CI education leaders. Graduates in 2022 had a median job search of 5 months, beginning 3-15 months before graduation; most had a position created for them. Nearly all graduates from 2016-2021 (61, 93.8%) had at least one change in roles/benefits since finishing training, with a trend for increased informatics time and salary. DISCUSSION: There was a wide variety of roles, salary, and funding sources for CI positions. This highlights some of the unique challenges CI fellows face and the importance of networking. These results will help CI education leaders, fellows, alumni, and prospective fellowship applicants. CONCLUSION: Graduates felt that CI fellowship had a significant impact on their career, were pleased with their first jobs and early career trajectory. Continued follow-up of the experience of new graduates and alumni is needed to assess emerging patterns over time.

Survey of clinical informatics fellows graduating 2016-2024: experiences before and during fellowship.

OBJECTIVE: To describe experiences and activities of Clinical Informatics (CI) fellows since the first fellowships were accredited in 2014. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a voluntary and anonymous survey of 394 alumni and current clinical informatics fellows from the graduating classes of 2016-2024 in the summer of 2022. RESULTS: We received 198 responses; 2% declined to participate. Most were male (62%), White (39%), 31-40 years old (72%), from primary care specialties (54%) and nonprocedural specialties (95%), and without prior informatics experience or any careers before medicine. Most fellows (87-94%) participated significantly in operations, research, coursework, quality improvement, and clinical care activities during fellowship. DISCUSSION: Women, underrepresented racial and ethnic minorities, and procedural physicians were underrepresented. Many incoming CI fellows did not have an informatics background. During CI fellowship, trainees earned Master's degrees and certificates, were exposed to many different types of CI activities, and were able to spend most of their time pursuing projects that supported their personal career goals. CONCLUSION: These findings represent the most comprehensive report to date of CI fellows and alumni. Physicians without prior informatics experience who are interested in CI should be encouraged to apply because CI fellowship provides a strong foundation of informatics knowledge while supporting fellows' personal career goals. There remains a lack of women and underrepresented minorities in CI fellowship programs; efforts to expand the pipeline are needed.

Pediatric Clinicians' Use of Telemedicine: Qualitative Interview Study.

BACKGROUND: Bedside manner describes how clinicians relate to patients in person. Telemedicine allows clinicians to connect virtually with patients using digital tools. Effective virtual communication or webside manner may require modifications to traditional bedside manner. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to understand the experiences of telemedicine providers with patient-to-provider virtual visits and communication with families at a single large-volume children's hospital to inform program development and training for future clinicians. METHODS: A total of 2 focus groups of pediatric clinicians (N=11) performing virtual visits before the COVID-19 pandemic, with a range of experiences and specialties, were engaged to discuss experiential, implementation, and practice-related issues. Focus groups were facilitated using a semistructured guide covering general experience, preparedness, rapport strategies, and suggestions. Sessions were digitally recorded, and the corresponding transcripts were reviewed for data analysis. The transcripts were coded based on the identified main themes and subthemes. On the basis of a higher-level analysis of these codes, the study authors generated a final set of key themes to describe the collected data. RESULTS: Theme consistency was identified across diverse participants, although individual clinician experiences were influenced by their specialties and practices. A total of 3 key themes emerged regarding the development of best practices, barriers to scalability, and establishing patient rapport. Issues and concerns related to privacy were salient across all themes. Clinicians felt that telemedicine required new skills for patient interaction, and not all were comfortable with their training. CONCLUSIONS: Telemedicine provides benefits as well as challenges to health care delivery. In interprofessional focus groups, pediatric clinicians emphasized the importance of considering safety and privacy to promote rapport and webside manner when conducting virtual visits. The inclusion of webside manner instructions within training curricula is crucial as telemedicine becomes an established modality for providing health care.

Teaching Medical Students Health Care Failure Mode and Effect Analysis: A Case Study of Inpatient Pain Management Computerized Decision Support.

There is a pressing need to provide health professional leaners experiential learning opportunities in health systems science and quality improvement. Moreover, there are several published tools to diagnose and treat health system vulnerabilities and hazards. The Health Care Failure Mode and Effect AnalysisTM (HFMEA) is a systems-engineering tool that the military and aerospace industries developed to proactively identify potential errors. While this technique has been used in a range of healthcare settings, there are few reports where health professional educators have used it with learners to teach quality improvement and systems engineering methods. We describe herewith an application of HFMEA in a medical informatics professional student rotation. In this manuscript, we briefly review HFMEA theory and methods, illustrate its application to address a quality improvement initiative, and reflect upon its value - and limitations - when used in an educational context.